Pugh matrix

Software based on this theory[ edit ] Rationalize. Morphological analysis is another form of a decision matrix employing a multi-dimensional configuration space linked by way of logical relationships. Importantly, it is not weighted to allow a quick selection process.

There are three ways to do this: Do this by distributing 10 points among the criteria. The Pugh Matrix was developed by Stuart Pugh who was a professor and head of the design division at the University of Strathclyde in Glasgow.

The effect on other systems is medium 2because waiters have to make several trips to the kitchen. This will create a matrix with the criteria on the vertical axis and the solutions on the horizontal axis. Decision Matrix Considerations A very long list of options can first be shortened with a tool such as list reduction or multivoting.

Again, be sure that positive numbers reflect desirable ratings. The team first establishes a list of weighted criteria and then evaluates each option against those criteria.

An interesting variation in team decision-making is for each individual to create his own pew matrix and then as a team the Pugh matrices are compared.

This means we are not looking at the attribute from a single perspective, such as that of the development group. An example of this might be to see how much your opinion would have to change in order for a lower ranked alternative to outrank a competing alternative.

The criteria is listed in a vertical list towards the extreme left of the paper or spreadsheet being used. It is frequently used in engineering for making design decisions but can also be used to rank investment options, vendor options, product options or any other set of multidimensional entities.

For each alternative proposal, the team should determine whether the alternative is Better, the Same, or Worse than the baseline, relative to each of the selection criteria: It is also used when only one solution is possible, only one product can be brought to market, has only sufficient financing for one solution or where the optimal alternative is required, and you are deciding on the basis of multiple criteria.

It does not matter the project management method agile or traditional or the product under development, determining the appropriate concept is the starting point and the Pugh matrix can help. Criteria that are often used fall under the general categories of effectiveness, feasibility, capability, cost, time required, support or enthusiasm of team and of others.

Pugh Matrix

What is Pugh Matrix and How to Use it. However, it has a record of coming up with the same solutions as mathematically intensive solutions would albeit with much less effort. We will compare the strategies we generate, in our case design concepts, against these attributes; some of the attributes will have a greater impact on our or customer level of satisfaction than others.

List down the Alternative Solutions Horizontally After the datum, list down all the alternative solutions horizontally. Selecting the appropriate datum is important because every solution will be evaluated against the datum.

Jump to navigation Jump to search The decision-matrix method, also Pugh method or Pugh Concept Selection, invented by Stuart Pugh [1]is a qualitative technique used to rank the multi-dimensional options of an option set.

Another Pugh Matrix Template for Microsoft Excel

In relation to criteria 1, do we consider that it is better, the same as, or worse than the baseline. We put the alternatives across the top, and we are going to assess these with respect to the criteria, which we draw in on the left.

The resultant scores better reflect the importance to the decision maker of the criteria involved. It can also be used where there are many alternatives, none of which are quite suitable. Many times weights are attached to criteria. Now consider option A. Pugh matrix, decision grid, selection matrix or grid, problem matrix, problem selection matrix, opportunity analysis, solution matrix, criteria rating form, criteria-based matrix.

Our baseline is the system we have in place at the moment, so we score this a nought against our criteria. Use a 1-to-9 scale for weighting the importance of the selection criteria, using 1 for the least important criteria and 9 for the most important criteria.

Sep 30,  · A matrix that aids decision making. This feature is not available right now.

Decision-matrix method

Please try again later. It is also called a variety of names including Pugh method, Pugh analysis, decision matrix method, decision matrix, decision grid, selection grid, selection matrix, problem matrix, problem selection matrix, problem selection grid, solution matrix, criteria rating form, criteria-based matrix, opportunity analysis.

The Pugh matrix can also be used to rate proposed improvements vs a baseline improvement, which might be the improvement suggested by the team or by management, using organizational goals or customer needs as the criteria for comparison.

Pugh Matrix Guidelines and Matrices for Picking Six Sigma Candidates Finding Green Belt and Black Belt candidates with the right personal and professional traits is a proven method for building a successful Six Sigma program.

Definition of Pugh Matrix: The Pugh matrix helps determine which items or potential solutions are more important or ‘better’ than others. It is employed after capturing voice of the customer (VOC).

It is a scoring matrix used for concept selection in which options are assigned scores relative to criteria. The Pugh Matrix is designed to assess multi-criterion project. The creation of criteria and alternatives will depend on the project members.

Pugh Matrix Template – Excel Download

It is also necessary that team members have enough knowledge about the problem, if possible have team member/s that belongs from the affected department.

Pugh matrix
Rated 0/5 based on 23 review
Pugh Matrix – iSixSigma