How to write papers that get cited and proposals that get funded

Then, I include my line-by-line specific comments. But this is different from the citation stacking you describe. I try to ensure we have cited the most relevant recent work when we submit papers from my group, but it is inevitable that we will miss some.

Writing science how to write papers that get cited and proposals that get funded

Its insights and strategies will equip science students, scientists, and professionals across a wide range of scientific and technical fields with the tools needed to communicate effectively. Writing Science is a much-needed guide to succeeding in modern science.

A good review needs to be clear and concrete. If the suggestion is off-base, and I have received and probably written such recommendations, the author should ignore them and explain in their cover letter why or just note the ones you have included.

Success isn't defined by getting papers into print, but by getting them into the reader's consciousness. The final section of the book deals with special challenges, such as how to discuss research limitations and how to writefor the public.

I try to carry my mentoring and career development responsibility into my editorial responsibilities. There's just a lot to consider when writing. It begins by building core arguments, analyzing why some stories are engaging and memorable while others are quickly forgotten, and proceeds to the elements of story structure, showing how the structures scientists and researchers use in papers and proposals fit into classical models.

Nov 28, Jiwoonglee rated it it was amazing Simply great and helpful. Writing Science is a much-needed guide to succeeding in modern science. Writing Science is built upon the idea that successful science writing tells a story.

Writing Science: How to Write Papers That Get Cited and Proposals That Get Funded

Rather it is to define a specific gap in that knowledge. She will ultimately tell the authors what changes they should make for the paper to become publishable. It not only made me feel better about my more common writing mistakes by noting that I am not alone, it gave me methods to fix them.

In such a case, you should probably recommend rejecting the paper. I can say with absolute certainty that I have never and will never do any such citation stacking as discussed in your open letter.

As it has come to matter less where we publish I think I have searched for a topic, downloaded a paper, read it, and cited it without ever noting where it was published.

If I choose not to take that advice, it makes me the good guy and helps me push the authors to fix the problems: You need to explain your reasoning and analysis clearly and objectively enough that the editors and authors can understand your recommendation.

Dealing with limitations It helps the editor decide whether a paper should be published, and which changes they should request or require. Such a system helped me to polish my early manuscripts into something worth reading, and so helped develop my career.

The book takes an integrated approach, using the principles of story structure to discuss every aspect of successful science writing, from the overall structure of a paper or proposal to individual sections, paragraphs, sentences, and words.

In my experience, reviewers are usually right when they identify problems, but are less reliably so in their suggestions for how to fix them. Summary "As a scientist, you are a professional writer: In such a case, you should probably recommend rejecting the paper. First, remember that the editor likely received two or three external reviews that might have varied in their assessments and recommendations—editors need to synthesize all that input before making a decision and offering guidance to the authors.

Is the manuscript itself well enough written and argued that with a reasonable level of revision it will likely become publishable.

Writing Science: How to Write Papers That Get Cited and Proposals That Get Funded

If I choose not to take that advice, it makes me the good guy and helps me push the authors to fix the problems: Therefore I would definitely recommend this book to read.

As a scientist, you are a professional writer: your career is built on successful proposals and papers. Success isn't defined by getting papers into print, but by getting them into the reader's consciousness. Writing Science How to Write Papers That Get Cited and Proposals That Get Funded Joshua Schimel.

A much-needed guide to succeeding in modern science writing. Find great deals for Writing Science: How to Write Papers That Get Cited and Proposals That Get Funded by Joshua Schimel (, Paperback).

Writing Science

Shop with confidence on eBay! How to Write Papers That Get Cited and Proposals That Get Funded by Joshua Schimel (, Paperback) + $ Brand New. Free Shipping. If you want to write proposals that get funded, and papers that get widely-cited, then read this book and put its lessons to work.

I loved the book: it's now the lab-group reading for next semester. Read more/5(). Writing Science: How to Write Papers That Get Cited and Proposals That Get Funded by Joshua Schimel As a scientist, you are a professional writer: your career is built on successful proposals and douglasishere.com: $ douglasishere.com: Writing Science: How to Write Papers That Get Cited and Proposals That Get Funded () by Joshua Schimel and a great selection of similar New, Used and Collectible Books available now at great prices/5().

How to write papers that get cited and proposals that get funded
Rated 5/5 based on 88 review
Writing Science | How to write papers that get cited and proposals that get funded